evidoria

What works in George Town

All catalogues · Cayman Islands profile· Malaysia profile

This profile covers practices recorded under this city name in 2 countries — check each practice's own page for its exact location.

3
evaluated practices
48/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Teacher capability & pedagogy +30 pts 67 here · 37 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +8 pts 67 here · 59 average

Weaknesses

Scalability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Innovation -13 pts 50 here · 63 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Sustainability / continuity -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 59
Transferability / demonstrated replication
67 · 60
Scalability
56 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Innovation
50 · 63
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
50 · 75
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 28
Sustainability / continuity
50 · 78
Equity & inclusion
0 · 52

Coloured bar: George Town. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Penang Skills Development Centre (PSDC) — Industry-Academia Skills Tri-Partnership · 81

Cayman Islands Runs a National 'AI Readiness' Teacher Training Ahead of 2026 CXC Assessment Reform · 33

Cayman Islands' Global Citizen Concierge Programme — A Rise-and-Lapse Remote-Worker Residency Route · 29

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Step-by-Step — Refugee-Redesigned Digital Mental Health App, Trialled Nationally in Lebanon · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more